1. A' has knocked down four teeth of 'B'. 'A' has committed the offence of:
2. Assault or criminal force used in attempting to commit theft of property is punishable under:
3. Theory of retribution-
4. Actus me invito factus non est mens actus' means
5. A', finds a gold ring on the road, knowing it be the property of 'Z', he having unknowingly lost it there 'A' picks up the ring and pledges it with a money-lender to raise a loan. 'A' has committed
6. Consider the following statements:
1. Every murder is culpable homicide
2. Every culpable homicide is murder
3. Every robbery is either theft or extortion
4. Every extortion is robbery
Which of the statements given above are correct?
1. Every murder is culpable homicide
2. Every culpable homicide is murder
3. Every robbery is either theft or extortion
4. Every extortion is robbery
Which of the statements given above are correct?
7. A instigates B to resist by force a distress made by a public servant, knowing full well that B most likely will cause hurt in the process. Hence B in consequence, resists that distress. In offering the resistance, B voluntarily causes grievous hurt to the officer executing the distress.
8. Using a genuine a Government stamp known to be counterfeit is dealt under-
9. Principle: Whoever tenders to any other person counterfeit coins or currency which he knows to be counterfeit, commits an offence.
Factual Situation: A was an employee in a private company. One day while depositing some money at the bank, handed over to him by the company's cashier, the bank's cashier identified a 100 rupee note as counterfeit and returned it to A. Then A went to a hotel, ordered lunch and handed over the counterfeit 100 rupee note at the hotel so as to get rid of it. The hotel manager identified the note as counterfeit and informed the police.
Factual Situation: A was an employee in a private company. One day while depositing some money at the bank, handed over to him by the company's cashier, the bank's cashier identified a 100 rupee note as counterfeit and returned it to A. Then A went to a hotel, ordered lunch and handed over the counterfeit 100 rupee note at the hotel so as to get rid of it. The hotel manager identified the note as counterfeit and informed the police.
10. Sections 61 and 62 of Indian Penal Code dealing with absolute forfeiture of all property of the offender have been abolished by:
Read More Section(Indian Penal Code)
Each Section contains maximum 100 MCQs question on Indian Penal Code. To get more questions visit other sections.
- Indian Penal Code - Section 1
- Indian Penal Code - Section 2
- Indian Penal Code - Section 3
- Indian Penal Code - Section 4
- Indian Penal Code - Section 5
- Indian Penal Code - Section 6
- Indian Penal Code - Section 7
- Indian Penal Code - Section 9
- Indian Penal Code - Section 10
- Indian Penal Code - Section 11
- Indian Penal Code - Section 12
- Indian Penal Code - Section 13
- Indian Penal Code - Section 14
- Indian Penal Code - Section 15
- Indian Penal Code - Section 16
- Indian Penal Code - Section 17
- Indian Penal Code - Section 18
- Indian Penal Code - Section 19
- Indian Penal Code - Section 20
- Indian Penal Code - Section 21
- Indian Penal Code - Section 22
- Indian Penal Code - Section 23
- Indian Penal Code - Section 24
- Indian Penal Code - Section 25
- Indian Penal Code - Section 26
- Indian Penal Code - Section 27
- Indian Penal Code - Section 28