A husband was directed to pay maintenance to his wife and his minor son under section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Subsequently the matter was settled outside Court on a lump-sum payment made by husband to the wife. Approximately after nine years of the agreement, the wife moved an application for the enforcement of the maintenance order. Which of the following statements will apply to the case?
A. The long delay of nine years will cause the application to be rejected
B. Mutual settlement outside the Court has rendered the order as void, as such the application will be rejected
C. The wife has wavered her right to maintenance and as such the application will be rejected
D. The waiver in derogation of a statutory right cannot be recognised by the Court, as such the application will be accepted
Answer: Option D
A. Three hundred rupees
B. Four hundred rupees
C. Five hundred rupees
D. Any Amount
A. Section 310A
B. Section 311A
C. Section 312A
D. Section 313A
Which of the following offence can be compounded without the permission of the court?
A. Voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
B. Causing miscarriage under section 312 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
C. Criminal breach of trust under section 406 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
D. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt under section 325 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
A. Five years
B. Four years
C. Three years
D. Two years
Join The Discussion