A lets a premises to B at a yearly rent of Rs. 50,000/-. The rent for whole of the years 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017 is due and unpaid. A sues B in 2018 only for the rent due for 2014 and 2015.
A. A by separate suit afterwards may sue B for the rent due for 2016 and 2017
B. A by separate suit cannot afterwards sue B for the rent due for 2016 and 2017
C. A by having leave from the Court sue B afterwards for the rent due for 2016 and 2017
D. A by consent of B may sue B afterwards for the rent due for 2016 and 2017
Answer: Option B
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion