A statement to become relevant under Section 32(1) of the Indian Evidence Act as dying declaration should have been made under which of the following circumstances?
A. It should have been made in relation to the succession to his property after his death
B. It should have been made under imminent expectation of death
C. It should be in relation to the cause of his death or circumstances of the transaction that resulted in his death
D. It should have been made in the will executed by him
Answer: Option C
Which section of the Indian Evidence Act protects communication during marriage?
A. Section 122
B. Section 123
C. Section 124
D. Section 125
A. Of 'B', because 'B' is a merchant in Delhi. 'A' has written many letters addressed to 'B'
B. Of 'C' because 'C' is a clerk of 'A' 'C's duty was to examineand file A's correspondence
C. Of 'D' because 'D' is Z's broker to whom Z habitually submitted the letters purporting to Bwritten by 'A' for the purpose of his advice
D. Of all the above
A. Section 120
B. Section 126
C. Section 123
D. Section 98
A. That relates to only the place of occurrence
B. That relates to nature of the object
C. That relates to the past user of the object
D. Information given by the accused, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered
Join The Discussion