A supplied to B, a minor, provisions such as wheat flour, rice and other food stuffs.
A. Since a minor's contract is void, A cannot recover the price of the provisions from B
B. A can recover the price from B as there is an agreement between A and B
C. A is not entitled to recover the money as he voluntarily supplied the provisions knowing that B was a minor
D. Since the provisions supplied constituted necessaries, A can recover the money
Answer: Option D
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion