ExamVeda
Login
Home

Assertion (A) In Minerva Mills v Union of India Article 31C...

This question belongs to Law Constitution Of India
Constitution of India
?

Assertion (A): In Minerva Mills v. Union of India Article 31C as amended by the Constitution (forty second Amendment) Act, 1976 was held invalid.
Reason (R): The amendment of Article 31C destroyed the basic structure of the Constitution.

Answer & Solution
Correct Answer: Option A
Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion
Examveda
Question posted by Examveda
Community

Join the Discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.
Keep Learning

Related Questions on Constitution of India

Chief Election Commissioner of India may be removed by
A. Resolution of cabinet by two third majority B. Resolution of both houses C. On recommendation of Chief Justice of India D. None of these
The largest committee of Parliament of India is
A. Public Accounts Committee B. Estimates Committee C. Committee on Public Undertakings D. Joint Parliamentary Committee
Which among the following statements is/are true according to I. R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu?
1. Judicial Review on legislations inserted in Schedule 9 is allowed when the legislation is not in conformity with basic structure doctrine.
2. Legislation effecting Fundamental Rights can be reviewed.
A. Only 1 B. Only 2 C. Both 1 and 2 D. Neither 1 nor 2
Ordinance promulgated by President under Article 123 of the Constitution of India shall cease to operate after . . . . . . . .
A. 3 months B. 6 months C. 6 weeks D. 15 days
More Related Questions on Constitution of India