Logical Deduction - General Inteligence & Reasoning MCQ Questions and Answers

1

Statements : No women teacher can play. Some women teachers are athletes.

Conclusions :
I. Male athletes can play.
II. Some athletes can play.

A) Only conclusion I follows B) Only conclusion II follows C) Either I or II follows D) Neither I nor II follows E) Both I and II follow

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

Solution:

Since one premise is negative, the conclusion must be negative. So, neither conclusion follows.

2

Statements : All bags are cakes. All lamps are cakes.

Conclusions :
I. Some lamps are bags.
II. No lamp is bag.

A) Only conclusion I follows B) Only conclusion II follows C) Either I or II follows D) Neither I nor II follows E) Both I and II follow

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

Solution:

Since the middle term 'cakes' is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows. However, I and II involve only the extreme terms and form a complementary pair. So, either I or II follows.

3

Statements : All mangoes are golden in colour. No golden-coloured things are cheap.

Conclusions :
I. All mangoes are cheap.
II. Golden-coloured mangoes are not cheap.

A) Only conclusion I follows B) Only conclusion II follows C) Either I or II follows D) Neither I nor II follows E) Both I and II follow

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

Solution:

Clearly, the conclusion must be universal negative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'No mango is cheap'. Since all mangoes are golden in colour, we may substitute 'mangoes' with 'golden-coloured mangoes'. Thus, II follows.

4

Statements : Some kings are queens. All queens are beautiful.

Conclusions :
I. All kings are beautiful.
II. All queens are kings.

A) Only conclusion I follows B) Only conclusion II follows C) Either I or II follows D) Neither I nor II follows E) Both I and II follow

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

Solution:

Since one premise is particular, the conclusion must be particular. So, neither I nor II follows.

5

Statements : Some doctors are fools. Some fools are rich.

Conclusions :
I. Some doctors are rich
II. Some rich are doctors.

A) Only conclusion I follows B) Only conclusion II follows C) Either I or II follows D) Neither I nor II follows E) Both I and II follow

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

Solution:

Since both the premises are particular, no definite conclusion follows.

6

Statements : All roads are waters. Some waters are boats.

Conclusions :
I. Some boats are roads.
II. All waters are boats.

A) Only conclusion I follows B) Only conclusion II follows C) Either I or II follows D) Neither I nor II follows E) Both I and II follow

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

Solution:

The first premise is A type and distributes the subject. So, the middle term 'waters' which forms its predicate, is not distributed. The second premise is I type and does not distribute either subject or predicate. So, the middle term 'waters' forming its subject is not distributed. Since the middle term is not distributed even once in the premises, no definite conclusion follows.

7

Statements : No bat is ball. No ball is wicket.

Conclusions :
I. No bat is wicket.
II. All wickets are bats.

A) Only conclusion I follows B) Only conclusion II follows C) Either I or II follows D) Neither I nor II follows E) Both I and II follow

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

Solution:

Let's break down this logical deduction question!

We're given two statements:
1. No bat is ball. This means there's no overlap between the 'bat' group and the 'ball' group.
2. No ball is wicket. This means there's no overlap between the 'ball' group and the 'wicket' group.

Now let's analyze the conclusions:

Conclusion I: No bat is wicket.
Just because bats and balls don't overlap, and balls and wickets don't overlap, doesn't automatically mean bats and wickets *also* don't overlap. They *could*, but the statements don't guarantee it. Think of it like this: I don't like apples, and apples aren't oranges. That doesn't mean I dislike oranges. So, this conclusion doesn't necessarily follow.

Conclusion II: All wickets are bats.
This is definitely not true. The statements give us *no* information to suggest that all wickets are bats. There's no link or containment implied. This conclusion doesn't follow.

Therefore, neither conclusion I nor conclusion II follows.

So the correct answer is Option D: Neither I nor II follows.

8

Statements : All flowers are trees. No fruit is tree.

Conclusions :
I. No fruit is flower.
II. Some trees are flowers.

A) Only conclusion I follows B) Only conclusion II follows C) Either I or II follows D) Neither I nor II follows E) Both I and II follow

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option E

Solution:

As discussed above, the conclusion must be universal negative and should not contain the middle term. So, it follows that 'No flower is fruit'. I is the converse of this conclusion and thus it follows. II is the converse of the first premise and so it also holds.

9

Statements : Every minister is a student. Every student is inexperienced.

Conclusions :
I. Every minister is inexperienced.
II. Some inexperienced are students.

A) Only conclusion I follows B) Only conclusion II follows C) Either I or II follows D) Neither I nor II follows E) Both I and II follow

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option E

Solution:

'Every' is equivalent to 'All'. Thus, since both the premises are universal and affirmative, the conclusion must be universal affirmative and should not contain the middle term. So, I follows. II is the converse of the second premise and thus it also holds.

10

Statements : All roads are poles. No pole is a house.

Conclusions :
I. Some roads are houses.
II. Some houses are poles.

A) Only conclusion I follows B) Only conclusion II follows C) Either I or II follows D) Neither I nor II follows E) Both I and II follow

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

Solution:

Since both the premises are universal and one premise is negative, the conclusion must be universal negative. So, neither I nor II follows.