Consider the following statements and give correct answer with the help of given below:
The case of Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose:
(1) has laid down that a minor's contract becomes valid when he attains majority.
(2) is the decision of the Supreme Court of India regarding minor's contract.
(3) is the decision of Privy Council regarding voidness of minor's contract.
(4) has laid down that contract without consideration is void.
A. (3) and (4) are correct, but (1) and (2) are incorrect
B. (1) and (2) are correct, but (3) and (4) are incorrect
C. (3) is correct, but (1), (2) and (4) are incorrect
D. (2) and (4) are correct, but (1) and (4) are incorrect
Answer: Option C
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion