"Delay in examining witnesses by investing officer does not ipso facto make prosecution version suspect. Investigating officer should be categorically questioned in aspect of delayed examination" was held in which of the following cases?
A. State of Uttar Pradesh v. Satish
B. Megha Singh v. State of Haryana
C. State of NCT, Delhi v. Ravikani Sharma
D. Balakrishna v. State of Orissa
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Code Of Criminal Procedure
A. Three hundred rupees
B. Four hundred rupees
C. Five hundred rupees
D. Any Amount
A. Section 310A
B. Section 311A
C. Section 312A
D. Section 313A
Which of the following offence can be compounded without the permission of the court?
A. Voluntarily causing hurt under Section 323 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
B. Causing miscarriage under section 312 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
C. Criminal breach of trust under section 406 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
D. Voluntarily causing grievous hurt under section 325 of the Indian Penal Code 1860
A. Five years
B. Four years
C. Three years
D. Two years
Join The Discussion