In case of a sub-agent lawfully appointed, which of the following is correct?
A. As regards third parties, the subagent can neither bind the principal nor the original agent
B. As regards third parties, the sub-agent can bind only the original agent
C. As regards third parties, the sub-agent binds the principal as an original agent can bind
D. As regards third parties, the sub-agent cannot bind the principal as an original agent
Answer: Option C
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion