ExamVeda
Login
Home

In the case of Mohori Bibee v Dharmodas Ghose the law...

This question belongs to Law Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act
?

In the case of Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose, the law that an agreement by a minor is void was settled by the Privy Council on the basis of Section 11 and other related provisions of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Which principle of interpretation was applied by the Privy Council in this case?

Answer & Solution
Correct Answer: Option A
Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion
Examveda
Question posted by Examveda
Community

Join the Discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.
Keep Learning

Related Questions on Indian Contract Act

Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer B. Counteroffer C. Communication D. None of these
X' in consideration of Rs. 10,000 lent by Y & Z, provides Y & Z jointly to repay them that sum with interest on a specified day. Y dies. The right to claim the performance
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone B. Is available to Z alone C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment B. The right of lien C. Test of agency D. Doctrine of frustration
Which of the following act will not amount to 'fraud' within the meaning of Section 17 of The Indian Contract Act?
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact B. A promise made without any intention of performing it C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true D. None above
More Related Questions on Indian Contract Act