In which case it was held that when charge or pledge is enforced by way of sale of the pledged or hypothecated goods the sale is for consideration and falls within the ambit of section 2(xxi) of Limitation Act
A. Federal Bank Ltd. v. State of Kerala(2007)
B. Hardev Singh v. Gurmail Singh (2006)
C. Jatinder Nath v. Chopra Land Developers (2005)
D. None of the above
Answer: Option A
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion