In which case of the Supreme Court has held "that the Mortgage was valid even though no part of mortgage-money has been advanced"?
A. Nathu Lal v. Phool Chand, AIR 1970 SC 546
B. State of Kerala v. Cochin Refineries, AIR 1968 SC 1361
C. Raghunath v. Kedar Nath, AIR 1969 SC 1316
D. Gurdas Mal v. Punjab & Sindh, Bank Ltd., 1933 Lah 972
Answer: Option B
Related Questions on Transfer of Property Act
A. Section 13
B. Section 14
C. Section 15
D. Section 16
Case of "Raj Kumar Kundu v. Mcqueen" is related to
A. Lis pendens
B. Part performance
C. Mortgage
D. Ostensible owner
A. Transfer by ostensible owner of the property for consideration
B. Transfer by owner of the property in which a widowhas life interest for maintenance
C. Both A and B
D. Neither A nor B
Which property cannot be transferred?
A. A public office
B. A mere chance to succeed
C. A mere right of re-entry
D. All of the above
Join The Discussion