ExamVeda
Login
Home

In which of the following case the Supreme Court held that...

This question belongs to Law Limitation Act
Limitation Act
?

In which of the following case the Supreme Court held that "Law of Limitation may harshly affect a particular party, but it has to be applied with all of its rigors when the statute so prescribes and the Courts have no power to extend the period of limitation on equitable ground"?

Answer & Solution
Correct Answer: Option A
Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion
Examveda
Question posted by Examveda
Community

Join the Discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.
Keep Learning

Related Questions on Limitation Act

Tort' in the Limitation Act, 1963 includes which of following?
A. Civil wrong, which is exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust B. Judicial wrong, which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust C. Civil wrong, which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust D. None of these
What will be the limitation period for instituting a suit for which no specific period of limitation is provided under Limitation Act, 1963?
A. 1 year B. 2 years C. 3 years D. No limitation
What is the period of limitation for filing a suit under Article 113 of the Limitation Act?
A. 5 years B. 6 months C. 3 years D. 6 years
Which of the following section of the Limitation Act, 1963 gives recognition to the concept of 'Adverse Possession'?
A. 22 B. 24 C. 26 D. 27 E. None of the above
More Related Questions on Limitation Act