Examveda
Examveda

In which of the following cases, did the Hon'ble Supreme Court decide the issue of territorial jurisdiction of the court to entertain a complaint under the Negotiable Instruments Act in reference to the Amending Ordinance of 2015?

A. (2016) 2 SCC 75, Bridgestone India Pvt. Ltd. v. Inderpal Singh

B. (2016) 11 SCC 105, K. S. Joseph v. Philip Carbon Black Ltd. & Ors

C. (2016) 1 SCC (Cri) 173, Ultratech Cement Ltd. v. Rakesh Kumar Singh & Anr

D. None of the above

Answer: Option A


This Question Belongs to Law >> Negotiable Instruments Act

Join The Discussion

Related Questions on Negotiable Instruments Act

The term 'legal representative' in section 29 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

A. Does not include executors or administrator (Rama v. Praoin, AIR 1926 Mad 389)

B. Includes executors or administrator (K. Subbanna v. K. Subbarayudu, AIR 1926 Mad 390)

C. Includes executors but does not include administrators (P. Nayar v. T. Ramanna, AIR 1929 Mad 389)

D. Includes only administrators but does not include executors (P. K. Pati v. Damodar Sahu, AIR 1953 Ori 179)