In which of the following cases it was held that the "Contract cannot be declared to have been frustrated because its performance had become more onerous on account of unforeseen circumstances"?
A. Premier Explosices Ltd. v. Chairman and Managing Director, Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd., AIR 2010 AP 107
B. M. V. Ramma v. T. N. Reddy, AIR 2010 AP 114
C. T. Mohan Reddy v. Potu, AIR 2010 AP 117
D. P. T. Reddy v. Jyoti Reddy, AIR 2010 AP 119
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion