In which of the following cases the Calcutta High Court held...

Home / Law / Limitation Act / Question

Examveda

In which of the following cases the Calcutta High Court held that "Though Limitation of 1 year as provided in Contempt of Courts Act, in fit case provisions of section 5 and 17 of Limitation Act can be applied by virtue of section 29(2)of Limitation Act"?

A. Subrata Kundu v. Kshiti Gostoami, AIR 2010 Cal 44

B. Nirpendra Ch. Dey v. Collector, AIR 2010 Cal 49

C. Aruna Ghosh v. Vimla, AIR 2010 Cal 62

D. Vikashini Ghosh v. A. K. Roy, AIR 2010 Cal 1

Answer: Option A

This Question Belongs to Law >> Limitation Act

Related Questions on Limitation Act

A. Civil wrong, which is exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust

B. Judicial wrong, which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust

C. Civil wrong, which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust

D. None of these

View Answer

A. 1 year

B. 2 years

C. 3 years

D. No limitation

View Answer

A. 5 years

B. 6 months

C. 3 years

D. 6 years

View Answer

A. 22

B. 24

C. 26

D. 27

E. None of the above

View Answer