In which of the following cases the nature scope and object...

Home / Law / Limitation Act / Question

Examveda

In which of the following cases, the nature, scope and object of acknowledgement within the meaning of Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963 was relevant before the Apex Court:

A. Shapur Fredoom Mazda v. Durga Prasad Chamaria, AIR 1961 SC 1236

B. Prabhakaranv. M. Azhagiri Pillai, AIR 2006 SC 1567

C. J. C. Budhiaja v. Chairman, Orissa Mining Corporation Ltd., AIR 2008 SC 1363

D. All the above

Answer: Option D

This Question Belongs to Law >> Limitation Act

Related Questions on Limitation Act

A. Civil wrong, which is exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust

B. Judicial wrong, which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust

C. Civil wrong, which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust

D. None of these

View Answer

A. 1 year

B. 2 years

C. 3 years

D. No limitation

View Answer

A. 5 years

B. 6 months

C. 3 years

D. 6 years

View Answer

A. 22

B. 24

C. 26

D. 27

E. None of the above

View Answer