In which of the following judgments it was told that: "the principle of unjust enrichment cannot be extended to give a right to the State to recover or realize vend fee after the concerned statute for realisation or recovery of vend fee has been struck down"
A. Somaiya Organics (India) Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 2001 SC 1725
B. V. R. Subramanyam v. B. Thayapa, (1961) 3 SCR 663
C. Jugapatiraja v. Sadnusannama, AIR 1916 Mad 980
D. None of the above
Answer: Option A
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion