ExamVeda
Login
Home

It is not necessary that an acknowledgement with Section 18 of...

This question belongs to Law Limitation Act
Limitation Act
?

It is not necessary that an acknowledgement with Section 18 of Limitation Act must contain a promise to payor should amount to a promise to pay. The statement is . . . . . . . .

Answer & Solution
Correct Answer: Option A
Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion
Examveda
Question posted by Examveda
Community

Join the Discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.
Keep Learning

Related Questions on Limitation Act

Tort' in the Limitation Act, 1963 includes which of following?
A. Civil wrong, which is exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust B. Judicial wrong, which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust C. Civil wrong, which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust D. None of these
What will be the limitation period for instituting a suit for which no specific period of limitation is provided under Limitation Act, 1963?
A. 1 year B. 2 years C. 3 years D. No limitation
What is the period of limitation for filing a suit under Article 113 of the Limitation Act?
A. 5 years B. 6 months C. 3 years D. 6 years
Which of the following section of the Limitation Act, 1963 gives recognition to the concept of 'Adverse Possession'?
A. 22 B. 24 C. 26 D. 27 E. None of the above
More Related Questions on Limitation Act