Match List I containing with List II containing the important principles used in deciding these cases and choose the correct options from the given below:
| List-I | List-II |
| a. Durga Prasad v. Baldeo | 1. The other party has done nothing in response to unilateral promise and hence no consideration. |
| b. Abudl Aziz v. Masum Ali | 2. No stranger to the consideration can take advantage of a contract, although made for his benefit. |
| c. Dutton v. Poole | 3. Act was not done at the desire of the promisor and hence no consideration. |
| d. Tweddle v. Atkinson | 4. The agreement may be enforced by the third person for whose benefit the agreement was made. |
A. a-3, b-2, c-1, d-4
B. a-1, b-3, c-4, d-2
C. a-3, b-1, c-4, d-2
D. a-4, b-1, c-2, d-3
Answer: Option C
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion