Match List I with List II and select the answer by using the given below the lists:
| List I | List II |
| a. Satyabrata Ghosh v. Mugneeram | 1. Invitation to Offer |
| b. Raj Rani v. Prem Adib | 2. Communication of Acceptance |
| c. Entores Ltd. v. Miles for East Corporation | 3. Minor's Agreement |
| d. Harvey v. Facey | 4. Doctrine of Frustration |
A. a-1, b-2, c-3, d-4
B. a-4, b-3, c-1, d-2
C. a-2, b-1, c-4, d-3
D. a-4, b-3, c-2, d-1
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion