Match List I with List II and select the correct answer by using the given below the lists:
| List I (Case) | List II (Principle) |
| a. Lalman Shukla v. Appana Dutt | 1. Privity of Contract |
| b. McPherson v. Appanna | 2. General offer |
| c. Banwarilal v. Sukhdarshan Dayal | 3. Invitation to treat |
| d. M. C. Chackoo v. State Bank of Travancore | 4. Intention to create legal relationship |
A. a-1, b-4, c-3, d-2
B. a-2, b-3, c-4, d-1
C. a-1, b-3, c-4, d-2
D. a-2, b-4, c-3, d-1
Answer: Option B
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion