Match List I with List II and select the correct answer by using the given below the lists:
| List I | List II |
| a. Cognizance of offences | 1. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 |
| b. Offences by companies and firms | 2. Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 |
| c. Dishonour of cheque for insufficiency of funds | 3. Section 143 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 |
| d. Power of court to try cases summarily | 4. Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 |
A. a-1, b-2, c-3, d-4
B. a-2, b-4, c-1, d-3
C. a-3, b-1, c-4, d-2
D. a-4, b-2, c-1, d-3
Answer: Option B
This Question Belongs to Law >> Negotiable Instruments Act
The term 'legal representative' in section 29 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
A. Does not include executors or administrator (Rama v. Praoin, AIR 1926 Mad 389)
B. Includes executors or administrator (K. Subbanna v. K. Subbarayudu, AIR 1926 Mad 390)
C. Includes executors but does not include administrators (P. Nayar v. T. Ramanna, AIR 1929 Mad 389)
D. Includes only administrators but does not include executors (P. K. Pati v. Damodar Sahu, AIR 1953 Ori 179)
In the case of a promissory note which is not negotiable
A. Notice of dishonour is compulsory
B. No notice of dishonour is necessary
C. Negotiable Instruments Act is silent on this aspect
D. Indorsement is necessary
The endorsement of a negotiable instrument is followed by delivery
A. Yes
B. No
C. Both (A) and (B)
D. None of the above
'Truncated Cheque' is dealt within which section of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881?
A. Section 5
B. Section 6
C. Section 7
D. Section 8
Join The Discussion