Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer under the given below the lists:
| List I | List-II |
| a. Mohiri Bibi Case | 1. Remoteness of damage |
| b. Satyabrata Chose Case | 2. Frustration of Contract |
| c. Hadley v. Baxendale | 3. Invitation to treat |
| d. Carlill v. Carbolic | 4. Minor's contract |
A. a-4, b-2, c-1, d-3
B. a-2, b-3, c-1, d-4
C. a-4, b-1, c-2, d-3
D. a-1, b-2, c-3, d-4
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion