Match List-I with List-II and select the correct answer using the given below:
| List-I (Types of Vitiating elements of a contract) | List-II (Relevant case-law) |
| a. Undue influence | 1. Nursey Spg. and Wvg. Co. Ltd., Re |
| b. Misrepresentation | 2. Jaggan Nath v. Secy of State for India |
| c. Fraud | 3. Lancashire Loans v. Black |
| d. Mistake | 4. Derry v. Peek |
A. a-2, b-4, c-3, d-1
B. a-1, b-3, c-4, d-2
C. a-3, b-1, c-4, d-2
D. a-3, b-1, c-2, d-4
Answer: Option C
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion