Match List I with List II and select the correct answer using the given below the lists:
| List I (Cases) | List II (Principles) |
| a. Satyabratha Ghosh v. Mugneeram | 1. Anticipatory breach of contract |
| b. West Bengal Financial Corp. v. Gluco Series | 2. Frustration of contract |
| c. Union of India v. Steel Authority of India | 3. Novation |
| d. Salima Jabeen v. National Insurance Co. | 4. Unjust benefit under mistake |
A. a-2, b-1, c-4, d-3
B. a-2, b-4, c-1, d-3
C. a-3, b-4, c-1, d-2
D. a-3, b-1, c-4, d-2
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion