| List-I | List-II |
| a. Doctrine of frustration | 1. Taylor v. Caldwell |
| b. Special damages | 2. Hochester v. Dela Tour |
| c. Anticipatory breach of contract | 3. Tinn v. Hoffman & Co. |
| d. Cross-offer | 4. Hadley v. Baxendale |
A. a-1, b-4, c-2, d-3
B. a-2, b-4, c-3, d-1
C. a-3, b-4, c-1, d-2
D. a-1, b-2, c-2, d-4
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Indian Contract Act
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion