ExamVeda
Login
Home

Read the following statements (1) The Supreme Court in N Balakrishnan...

This question belongs to Law Limitation Act
Limitation Act
?

Read the following statements:
(1) The Supreme Court in N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy, (1998) 7 SCC 123 refuse to condone the delay on the ground of sufficient cause
(2) In the case of R. B. Ramalingum v. R. B. Bhuwaneshwari, (2009) 2 SCC 689, the Supreme Court observed that the test of sufficient cause is purely an individuals test of the above:

Answer & Solution
Correct Answer: Option B
Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion
Examveda
Question posted by Examveda
Community

Join the Discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.
Keep Learning

Related Questions on Limitation Act

Tort' in the Limitation Act, 1963 includes which of following?
A. Civil wrong, which is exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust B. Judicial wrong, which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust C. Civil wrong, which is not exclusively the breach of a contract or the breach of trust D. None of these
What will be the limitation period for instituting a suit for which no specific period of limitation is provided under Limitation Act, 1963?
A. 1 year B. 2 years C. 3 years D. No limitation
What is the period of limitation for filing a suit under Article 113 of the Limitation Act?
A. 5 years B. 6 months C. 3 years D. 6 years
Which of the following section of the Limitation Act, 1963 gives recognition to the concept of 'Adverse Possession'?
A. 22 B. 24 C. 26 D. 27 E. None of the above
More Related Questions on Limitation Act