Under section 39 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 the provision is made for transfer where the third person is entitled to maintenance. In this context the court held that right of maintenance, even of a Hindu widow, is an identified right which falls short of a charge. This was decided in case of:
A. Ramanandan v. Rangammal, (1889) 12 Mad 260
B. Ram Kumar v. Ram Dai, (1900) 22 All 326
C. Rachawa v. Shivayogoda, (1893) 18 Bom 679
D. None of the above
Answer: Option A
This Question Belongs to Law >> Transfer Of Property Act
Related Questions on Transfer of Property Act
A. Section 13
B. Section 14
C. Section 15
D. Section 16
Case of "Raj Kumar Kundu v. Mcqueen" is related to
A. Lis pendens
B. Part performance
C. Mortgage
D. Ostensible owner
A. Transfer by ostensible owner of the property for consideration
B. Transfer by owner of the property in which a widowhas life interest for maintenance
C. Both A and B
D. Neither A nor B
Which property cannot be transferred?
A. A public office
B. A mere chance to succeed
C. A mere right of re-entry
D. All of the above
Join The Discussion