A. It always performs well regardless of pattern length.
B. It works well for very short patterns.
C. It skips large portions of the text, making it faster for large datasets.
D. It uses less memory.
Answer: Option C
This Question Belongs to Data Structure >> String Matching
A. Naive Search
B. Rabin-Karp
C. Boyer-Moore
D. Knuth-Morris-Pratt (KMP)
What is the time complexity of the Boyer-Moore string matching algorithm in the best case?
A. O(m + n)
B. O(n)
C. O(m/n)
D. O(m log n)
Which string matching algorithm uses hashing to achieve its results?
A. Boyer-Moore
B. Rabin-Karp
C. Naive Search
D. Boyer-Moore
In which scenario does the Naive string matching algorithm perform well?
A. When using a large alphabet.
B. When there are many potential matches.
C. When both the pattern and text are very short.
D. When the pattern is long and the text is large.
Join The Discussion