When the consent to an agreement is caused by misrepresentation or by silence, fraudulent within the meaning of Section 17 and the party whose consent was so caused had the means of discovering the truth with ordinary diligence, then
A. Such a contract is unenforceable being voidable
B. Such a contract is unenforceable being void
C. Such a contract is valid and enforceable
D. None of these
Answer: Option C
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion