Where persons reciprocally promise, firstly to do certain things which are legal and secondly, under specified circumstances, to do certain oth hings which are illegal the
A. First set of promise is a contract, but the second is a void agreement
B. First set of promise is voidable but the second set is a void agreement
C. Entire set of promises is void
D. Entire set of promises is valid
Answer: Option A
Indian Contract Act:- Gods displayed in showcase of a shop with price tag is -
A. Invitation to offer
B. Counteroffer
C. Communication
D. None of these
A. Is available to Y's representatives alone
B. Is available to Z alone
C. Is available to Y's representatives & Z both
D. Is available to Y's representatives & after the death of Z, his representatives
Moses v. Macferlan (1555-1774) is a case relating to
A. Theory of unjust enrichment
B. The right of lien
C. Test of agency
D. Doctrine of frustration
A. The active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact
B. A promise made without any intention of performing it
C. The suggestion, as a fact, of that which is true, by one who does believe it to be true
D. None above
Join The Discussion