Within the meaning of provision under section 39 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 a woman is entitled to maintenance not only from the husband, but also from sons who are members of joint family. This was decided in case of:
A. S. Periaswami v. Chellawal, (1980) 1 Mad LJ 46
B. Raghvan v. Nagamal, (1979) 1 Mad LJ 172
C. Chandramna v. Maniam Vankettareddy, AIR 1958 AP 396
D. Basudev Dey Sarkar v. Chhaya Dey Sarkar, AIR 1991 Cal 399
Answer: Option A
Related Questions on Transfer of Property Act
A. Section 13
B. Section 14
C. Section 15
D. Section 16
Case of "Raj Kumar Kundu v. Mcqueen" is related to
A. Lis pendens
B. Part performance
C. Mortgage
D. Ostensible owner
A. Transfer by ostensible owner of the property for consideration
B. Transfer by owner of the property in which a widowhas life interest for maintenance
C. Both A and B
D. Neither A nor B
Which property cannot be transferred?
A. A public office
B. A mere chance to succeed
C. A mere right of re-entry
D. All of the above
Join The Discussion