According to the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988, which one of the following is NOT correct?

A) A Sub-Inspector of Delhi Special Police Establishment, is authorized to investigate a matter generally without order of the Metropolitan Magistrate/Magistrate of the first class B) In Ahmedabad, an Assistant Commissioner of Police is authorized to investigate a matter generally without order of the Metropolitan Magistrate/Magistrate of the first class C) In Kanpur, a Deputy Superintendent of Police is authorized to investigate a matter generally without order of the Metropolitan Magistrate /Magistrate of the first class D) In Mumbai, an Assistant Commissioner of Police is authorized to investigate a matter generally without order of the Metropolitan Magistrate/Magistrate of the first class

Answer & Solution

Correct Answer: Option A

Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion

Question posted by Examveda

Community

Join the Discussion

Join the discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.

Keep Learning

According to the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988...

According to the provisions of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988, which one of the following is NOT correct?

Join the Discussion

Related Questions on Information Technology Act