In execution of a decree obtained by A against, B, certain property belonging to B is attached. During the pendency of the attachment, B mortgages the property to C. The property is then sold in execution of the decree and purchased by D.
A. Here, the mortgage having been made contrary to the attachment is void as against A's claim, and D is not entitled to take the property free from the mortgage created by B
B. Here, the mortgage having been made contrary to the attachment is not void as against A's claim, and D is not entitled to take the property free from the mortgage created by B
C. Here, the mortgage having been made contrary to the attachment is void as against A's claim, and D is entitled to take the property free from the mortgage created by B
D. None of these
Answer: Option C
This Question Belongs to Law >> Code Of Civil Procedure
Under Order 8 Rule 6 Code of Civil Procedure set-off may be permitted if-
A. The suit is for recovery of property
B. Set-off claimed by the defendant is ascertained sum of money
C. Value of property recoverable is less than rupees two lacs
D. Defendant presents a written statement of the suit
A. Is barred under all circumstances
B. Is not barred at all
C. Can be filed with the leave of the court
D. Either B or C
A. Such property actually received or might have received together with interest
B. Property actually received including profits due to improvements made by such person
C. Such property actually received or might have received but without any interest on such profits
D. Such property actually received
Join The Discussion