ExamVeda
Login
Home

In P Rathinam v Union of India (1994) 3 SCC 394...

This question belongs to Law Indian Penal Code
Indian Penal Code
?

In P. Rathinam v. Union of India (1994) 3 SCC 394 the Supreme Court held Section 309 Indian Penal Code as unconstitutional. Was this judgment overruled and if so in which case?

Answer & Solution
Correct Answer: Option A
Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion
Examveda
Question posted by Examveda
Community

Join the Discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.
Keep Learning

Related Questions on Indian Penal Code

Which of the following is an offence of continuing under Indian Penal Code, 1860?
A. Rape B. Theft C. Abetment D. Abduction
Sexual intercourse by husband upon his wife during separation attracts a punishment of
A. Imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 3 years but which may extend to 5 years and fine B. Imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 3 years but which may extend to 7 years and fine C. Imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 2 years but which may extend to 5 years and fine D. Imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 2 years but which may extend to 7 years and fine
Against whom among the following, the offence of abduction is committed?
A. Woman B. Child below the age of 18 years C. Child below the age of 12 years D. Any person
Culpable homicide means
A. Attempt to cause death B. Causing death intentionally C. Causing grievous injury D. Causing injury which is likely to cause death
More Related Questions on Indian Penal Code