In which of the following case it was observed by Hon'ble Supreme Court that "Hindu widow is not coparcener in undivided family of her husband, therefore, she cannot act as Karta of that undivided family, however she can act as its manager":
A. Shreya Vidyarthi v. Ashok Vidyarthi and others, (2015) 16 Supreme Court Cases 46
B. Mahima Savin Bansal v. Savin Bansal and others, (2015) 16 Supreme Court Cases 228
C. Sreeja V. v. Rajesh Puliyankakath, (2015) 16 Supreme Court Cases 450
D. Yellapu Uma Maheshwari v. Buddha Jagadheeswararao, (2015) 16 Supreme Court Cases 787
Answer: Option A
The children born out of a void Hindu Marriage are in the eye of law
A. Illegitimate
B. Legitimate
C. Illegitimate, having no rights in ancestral property
D. Legitimate but having right of inheritance limited to their parent's property only
A. Entitled to claim maintenance as dependant
B. Not entitled to claim maintenance as dependant
C. Entitled to claim maintenance with the consent of other heirs
D. Entitled to claim maintenance through the judicial process
A. Remains valid
B. Becomes void
C. Becomes voidable
D. None of these
A petition Under Section 12 of Hindu Marriage Act can be filed if:
A. The marriage is solemnized before the commencement of Act
B. The marriage is solemnized before or after the commencement of Act
C. The marriage is solemnized after the commencement of Act
D. The marriage is solemnized after 1956
Join The Discussion