Constitution Of India MCQ question and answer

71

Under the law, certain posts are reserved for the residents of a region of a state on the ground that it was a very backward area as compared to the other areas of the state. The reservation is

A) Valid as residential qualifications can be prescribed under Article 16(3) B) Invalid as it is violative of Article 16(1) and 16(2) C) Invalid as residential qualification can be prescribed for the whole of the state and not part of a state under Article 16(3) D) valid as under Article 16(4) reservation can be made for backward classes and people living in backward areas and are backward

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

72

Point out the correct statement:

A) A State Legislature can make a law to modify any provisions of Part III in relation to the members of the forces charged with the maintenance of public order B) The powers of the High Courts under article 227 can be ousted C) No one can be compelled to undergo brain mapping test D) All India services can be created in accordance with article 312 read with article 320 of the Constitution

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option C

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

73

Jagmohan Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1973 SC 947 establishes that award of death sentence is

A) Violative of Article 21 of the Constitution B) Violative of Article 14 of the Constitution C) Violative of Article 19 of the Constitution D) Not violative of Article 21 of the Constitution

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

74

The protection of life and personal liberty under Article 21 is

A) Available to citizens only B) Available to any person C) Not available to enemy alien D) Not available to a person arrested under a preventive detention law

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

75

In which case it is discussed that "is it permissible for Parliament under Article 31B to immunise legislations from being struck down for violation of fundamental rights by inserting them into IX Schedule and is its effect on process of judicial review of the Supreme Court and High Courts

A) Daryao v. State of Uttar Pradesh B) Krishna Swami v. Union of India C) State of Rajasthan v. Union of India D) I. R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

76

The Finance Commission gives recommendations to President as to:

A) Distribution of not proceeds of taxes between Union and States B) Principles which should govern the grants-in-aid of the revenue of the States of the Consolidated Funds of India C) Measures needed to augment the Consolidated Funds of a State to supplement the resources of Panchayats and Municipalities D) All the above

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

77

Which of the functionaries can be invited to give his opinion to the Parliament?

A) Chief Justice of India B) Chief Election Commission of India C) Comptroller and Auditor General of India D) Attorney General of India

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

78

In the following which dispute is not covered in original jurisdiction of Supreme Court?

A) Between the government of India and one or more states B) Between the government of India and any state or states one side and one or more other states on the other C) Between two or more states D) Pre-constitutional treaty or agreement

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option D

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

79

Mohini Jain v. Union of India lays down

A) Right to Work recognised as Fundamental Rights B) Right to Education C) Right to Life D) Right to Equality

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

80

In which one of the following case the Supreme Court of India held that right to access to drinking water is fundamental to life and it is the duty of the State under Act 21 to provide clean drinking water to its citizens?

A) Vellore Citizens Welfareforum v. Union of India B) Andhra Pradesh Pollution Control Board v. M. V. Nayadu C) M. C Mehtha v. Union of India D) Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board v. Shri C. Kenchappa

Discuss

Answer & Solution

Answer: Option B

No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board

Constitution Of India MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question