Match the cases mentioned in List I with legal issues mentioned in List II and select the correct answer using the given below:

List I List II

a. Tulasamma v. Sesha Reddy 1. Right of a daughter to reopen the partition is valid

b. John Vallamatom v. UOI 2. A Hindu having a daughter under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956

c. R. Kantha v. UOI 3. Limited estate of a woman becomes absolute estate

d. Sandhya v. Union of India 4. Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is unconstitutional

A) a-2, b-4, c-1, d-3 B) a-3, b-4, c-2, d-1 C) a-4, b-3, c-1, d-2 D) a-3, b-4, c-1, d-2

Answer & Solution

Correct Answer: Option D

Let's discuss the solution. Join the discussion

Question posted by Examveda

Community

Join the Discussion

Join the discussion

No comments yet Be the first to discuss this question.

Keep Learning

List I	List II
a. Tulasamma v. Sesha Reddy	1. Right of a daughter to reopen the partition is valid
b. John Vallamatom v. UOI	2. A Hindu having a daughter under the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956
c. R. Kantha v. UOI	3. Limited estate of a woman becomes absolute estate
d. Sandhya v. Union of India	4. Section 118 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is unconstitutional