There was a slaughter house in a locality X took a...

Home / Law / Law Of Torts / Question

Examveda

There was a slaughter house in a locality. X took a house there to live in. The slaughter house was a great nuisance. X sued for damages
Which of the following is correct in this respect?

A. X would succeed

B. X would not succeed as he voluntarily came there

C. The defence of valenti non fit injuria is available to the owner of the slaughterhouse

D. The defence of reasonable care is available to the owner of the slaughterhouse

Answer: Option B

This Question Belongs to Law >> Law Of Torts

Related Questions on Law of Torts

A. Winterbottom v. Wright

B. Pasley v. Freeman

C. Winsmore v. Greenbank

D. Rookes v. Barnard

View Answer

A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy

B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk

C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk

D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury

View Answer

A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.

B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners

C. Derry v. Peek

D. Cann v. Willson

View Answer

A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act

B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act

C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act

D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act

View Answer