Two dogs, belonging to two different persons, acting in concert attacked a flock of sheep and injured them.
Which one of the following is the correct statement? In an action for damages:
A. One of them is liable for one-half of the damage caused by his dog
B. Each of them is liable for full damage caused by their dogs
C. None of them is liable for full damage caused by their dogs
D. Each of them is liable for proportional damage caused by their dogs
Answer: Option B
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
Join The Discussion