Where the words alleged to be defamatory do not appear to be such on their face, the plaintiff must prove the latent or secondary meaning which makes the statement defamatory. Such explanatory statements are called

A. Winterbottom v. Wright B. Pasley v. Freeman C. Winsmore v. Greenbank D. Rookes v. Barnard

A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury

A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co. B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners C. Derry v. Peek D. Cann v. Willson

A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act