Which of the following statements are not correct?
(1) Res ipsa loquitur is used for the purpose of fixation of liability based on strict liability.
(2) Inference of negligence could properly be drawn in res ipsa loquitur
(3) Res ipsa loquitur dispenses with taking of evidence
(4) Res ipsa loquitur mostly favours the defendant
Select the correct answer using the given below:
A. (1), (2) and (3)
B. (1), (3) and (4)
C. (2), (3) and (4)
D. (1), (2), and (4)
Answer: Option B
This Question Belongs to Law >> Law Of Torts
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
Join The Discussion