Which of the following statements is true about malice-in-law and malice-in-fact?
A. The former is a wrongful act done intentionally with evil motive whereas the latter is a wrongful act done intentionally without a just cause
B. The former is a wrongful act done intentionally without just cause whereas the latter is a wrongful act done intentionally with evil motive
C. The former is a wrongful act done intentionally whereas the latter is a wrongful act done intentionally
D. Both have same consequences
Answer: Option B
This Question Belongs to Law >> Law Of Torts
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
Join The Discussion