Which one of the following is not correct?
A. In tort, damages are unliquidated but is breach of contract, they are liquidated
B. The duty in tort is primarily fixed by the law but in a contract the same IS created by, parties themselves
C. Proof of malice is generally necessary for an action in tort while it is not relevant in case of breach of contract
D. In tort, the duty is towards persons generally, while in contract the same is towards the parties to the agreement
Answer: Option C
This Question Belongs to Law >> Law Of Torts
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
Join The Discussion