Which one of the following statements is correct?
A. The occupier has no duty to protect the goods of the visitor which is kept in his premises from theft by a third party
B. The occupier has a common duty to care to protect the goods of his visitor which is kept in his premises with the occupier's permission from theft by a third party
C. The occupier will liable for injury caused by defective premises only if he is in exclusive occupation of the premises
D. A, the occupier of the premises will be invariably liable to his invitee for the negligence of an independent contractor
Answer: Option D
This Question Belongs to Law >> Law Of Torts
The 'tort of intimidation' was propounded in
A. Winterbottom v. Wright
B. Pasley v. Freeman
C. Winsmore v. Greenbank
D. Rookes v. Barnard
The maxim 'scienti non fit injuria' means
A. Where there is no fault, there is no remedy
B. Mere knowledge does not imply consent to take risk
C. Mere giving consent does not imply to take risk
D. Scientific knowledge is not enough to cause injury
A. Scott v. London & St. Katharine Docks Co.
B. Hedley Byrne Co. Ltd. v. Heller & Partners
C. Derry v. Peek
D. Cann v. Willson
A. Section 82 of the Evidence Act
B. Section 102 of the Evidence Act
C. Section 122 of the Evidence Act
D. Section 124 of the Evidence Act
Join The Discussion