ExamVeda
Login
Home

Indian Evidence Act MCQ question and answer | Law MCQ question

Indian Evidence Act MCQ question and answer with easy explanations in Law MCQ. Indian Evidence Act MCQ section is suitable for aspirants preparing for competitive exams like NET, UPSC, JRF, SET,UGC NET other law exams etc. Page-3 section-1

Each section contains 100 MCQs on Indian Evidence Act .
21
When a person summoned to produce a document and he produces a document then
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
Solution:
The correct answer is Option D: He does not become a witness and cannot be cross-examined unless and until he is called as a witness.

Let's break down why:

Imagine someone is asked by the court to bring a specific document. This is called being summoned to produce a document.

Option A is incorrect: Simply handing over a document doesn't automatically make them a witness. A witness gives testimony under oath.

Options B and C are incorrect: Cross-examination is when lawyers question a witness to test the truth of their statements. If the person isn't a witness, they can't be cross-examined yet.

Option D is correct: The person is only acting as a document provider, fulfilling a court order.

Important point: They only become a witness if one of the parties (or the court) decides to call them as a witness to explain or verify the document. Only then can they be questioned (including cross-examined).
22
When one fact is declared by the Indian Evidence Act to be conclusive proof of another, the court, on proof of one fact:
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
23
Which of the following provisions of Indian Evidence Act permits evidence recorded in one case to be considered relevant in a subsequent proceeding?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
24
Evidence of a witness in a previous proceeding would be admissible under section 33 of the evidence act only if the adverse party in the first proceeding had the right and opportunity to cross-examine the witness'. The statement is . . . . . . . .?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
25
Statement made in anticipation of death by a person who survives, to a police officer, would be
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
Solution:
In general, a statement made by a person in anticipation of death is admissible as a dying declaration under Section 32 of the Indian Evidence Act. However, for a statement to be admissible, it must be made by a person who subsequently dies due to the injuries or circumstances mentioned in the statement.

In the given scenario, the statement is made by a person who survives and communicates it to a police officer. Since the person does not subsequently die, the statement does not qualify as a dying declaration and is therefore considered inadmissible as evidence under the Indian Evidence Act.

Therefore, the correct answer is:
C. Inadmissible
26
Electronics records produced before the court are:
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
27
Accused wants to submit a document for consideration under Section 35 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. In which of the following cases will the document become irrelevant
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
28
Which one of the following has not been mentioned as a ground under section 24 rendering a confession by an accused person irrelevant
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
29
Mandatory requirement of Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act is that . . . . . . . .
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
30
Indian Evidence Act deals with:
1. Relevancy of evidence
2. Reliability of evidence
3. Admissibility of evidence
Select the correct answer:
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
Solution:
The Indian Evidence Act primarily deals with the rules and regulations governing the admissibility of evidence in Indian courts. It outlines the criteria that evidence must meet to be considered relevant and admissible in legal proceedings.

1. Relevancy of evidence:
The Indian Evidence Act addresses the relevancy of evidence, which means determining whether evidence is logically connected to the facts in issue or to a relevant fact. It outlines various provisions regarding the types of evidence that are considered relevant and can be presented in court to establish or disprove a fact in question.

2. Reliability of evidence:
While the Indian Evidence Act does indirectly consider the reliability of evidence through provisions related to credibility and weight of evidence, it primarily focuses on determining whether evidence is relevant and admissible rather than explicitly addressing the reliability of evidence as a separate concept.

3. Admissibility of evidence:
One of the main functions of the Indian Evidence Act is to establish the rules for the admissibility of evidence in court proceedings. It outlines the criteria that evidence must meet to be legally acceptable and presented before the court. The act specifies various circumstances under which evidence may be admissible or inadmissible.

Given that the Indian Evidence Act primarily deals with the relevancy and admissibility of evidence, the correct answer is Option B: 1 and 3 only.