ExamVeda
Login
Home
41
Which statement is not correct in the light of Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
42
Confidential Communication with whom of the following is protected under Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
43
Section 13 of Evidence Act
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
44
In which of the following there is no estoppel
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
Solution:
In all the options provided, there is no application of estoppel:

Option A: On a point of law
Estoppel does not apply on points of law because individuals cannot be prevented from relying on the correct legal interpretation of a statute or legal principle. Estoppel primarily operates in the realm of facts, not law.

Option B: Against a statute
Estoppel cannot be invoked against a statute because statutes are paramount and take precedence over any inconsistent statements or actions. Individuals cannot be estopped from enforcing their rights or complying with statutory obligations.

Option C: Attestation of a deed
Attestation of a deed involves the act of witnessing the signing of a document to confirm its authenticity. While attestation serves a purpose in legal formalities, it does not involve estoppel. Estoppel pertains to preventing a party from asserting a fact inconsistent with a previous position, which is not the case with attestation.

Therefore, Option D correctly states that there is no application of estoppel in any of the scenarios mentioned.
45
The primary evidence in respect of a document, which is prepared in many original copies, will be:
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
46
'Proof' is the result of
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
47
Oral evidence of fact invalidating the document is admissible under
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
48
Under which section of the Indian evidence act the conduct of the accused us relevant?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
49
Which one of the following Sections of the Indian Evidence Act provides for admissibility of secondary evidence?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
50
In civil cases no admission is not relevant if . . . . . . . .
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option A
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board