ExamVeda
Login
Home
21
The rule of strict liability
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
22
Compensation can be awarded to a person who suffered personal injuries at the hand of government officers whichamounted to tortious act.' This was held in
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
23
The rule in Rylands v. Fletcher does not apply when the escape is due to:
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
24
There is a children's school by the side of a highway while classes are going on, two children of the school stray on the highway. A truck is moving on the highway at normal speed. While trying to avoid hitting the children, the truck collides with a bullock cart. One person is injured, the bullocks die and the truck is also damaged. Which one of the following propositions correctly describes the liability?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
25
Which one of the following is not an element of the tort of malicious prosecution?
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
26
The State is vicariously liable in an action for tort if the act done by its employee is:
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
27
Reasonable forsight as test to determine remoteness of damage' was laid down in
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option B
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board
28
The rule of Absolute Liability was first laid down by
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option C
Solution:
The principle of Absolute Liability holds a person liable for harm or damage caused by their actions, regardless of their intentions or negligence. This concept is essential in the field of Law of Torts, where individuals can be held accountable for certain activities that result in harm, even if they took all possible precautions to prevent the harm. Option A: Lord Atkin in 1635

This option is incorrect. Lord Atkin is known for the famous case of Donoghue v. Stevenson in 1932, which established the modern concept of negligence and the neighbour principle.

Option B: Justice Blackburn in 1868
This option is incorrect. Justice Blackburn is associated with legal decisions, but not specifically with the establishment of the rule of Absolute Liability.

Option D: Chief Justice Holt in 1868
This option is incorrect. Chief Justice Holt is known for his contributions to English common law, but not for laying down the rule of Absolute Liability.

The correct answer is Option C: Winfield in 1765, as he was the one who first laid down the principle of Absolute Liability in the context of tort law.
29
. . . . . . . . propounded the theory that the primary purpose of the law of Tort is social engineering.
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option E
Solution:
In the context of the Law of Torts, the theory of social engineering posits that one of the main objectives of tort law is to bring about desired changes in society by influencing behavior and promoting a safer and fairer environment. This theory emphasizes that tort law serves not only as a means of compensating victims but also as a tool to shape societal norms and encourage responsible conduct. It views tort law as a mechanism for achieving broader social goals and fostering a sense of accountability among individuals and entities.

Option A: Prof. Hart
This option is incorrect. Prof. Hart, also known as H.L.A. Hart, was a legal philosopher known for his contributions to the philosophy of law, particularly the concept of legal positivism.

Option B: Prof. William L. Prosser
This option is incorrect. Prof. William L. Prosser was a prominent figure in tort law and contributed significantly to the field with his writings, but he is not specifically associated with the theory of social engineering.

Option C: Prof. Fraser
This option is incorrect. Prof. Fraser is not commonly associated with the theory that the primary purpose of the law of Tort is social engineering.

Option D: Prof. Kenny
This option is incorrect. Prof. Kenny is not commonly associated with the theory that the primary purpose of the law of Tort is social engineering.

The correct answer is Option E: Prof. Roscoe Pound, as he propounded the theory that the primary purpose of the law of Tort is social engineering.
30
One out of the following is not a defence in a case of negligence
Discuss
Answer & Solution
Answer: Option D
No explanation is given for this question. Let's Discuss on Board